Bright Data vs Infatica
Detailed comparison between Bright Data and Infatica. Analyze features, pricing, performance, and user feedback to make the best choice for your needs.
Quick Overview
Compare key features and metrics at a glance
Bright Data
Residential
Bright Data (formerly Luminati) is the industry leader in residential proxy services, trusted by 20,000+ customers worldwide. With 150M+ ethically-sourced IPs from 195 countries and a 99.99% uptime SLA, Bright Data sets the gold standard for enterprise-grade proxy solutions.
Key Features
Infatica
Enterprise-Grade Proxies
Enterprise-grade proxy solutions with 20M+ proxy IPs across 195 countries. Offering residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies with personalized service.
Key Features
Head-to-Head Metrics
| Metric | Bright Data | Infatica | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
User Rating | 4.9 (2850+ reviews) | 4.8 (500+ reviews) | Bright Data |
Starting Price | $4.20/GB Premium | $0.15/GB Enterprise-Grade Proxies | Infatica |
Performance | ~0.7s Response | 0.4s Response | Use Case Dependent |
IP Pool Size | 150M+ IPs | 20M+ IPs | Bright Data |
Geographic Coverage | 195+ Countries | 195 Countries | Infatica |
Key Features Breakdown
1Bright Data
150M+ Ethically-sourced IPs
Largest residential IP pool in the industry
99.99% Uptime SLA
Industry-leading reliability guarantee
ISO 27001 Certified
Enterprise-grade security standards
HTTP/3 & QUIC Support
Latest protocol technology
Free Proxy Manager
Advanced management tools included
24/7 Human Support
Expert assistance when you need it
13Infatica
20M+ Proxy IPs
Infatica highlights 20m+ proxy ips as a core part of its enterprise-grade proxies proxy offering.
Zero CAPTCHAs or IP Blocks
Infatica highlights zero captchas or ip blocks as a core part of its enterprise-grade proxies proxy offering.
Ethically-sourced Proxies
Infatica highlights ethically-sourced proxies as a core part of its enterprise-grade proxies proxy offering.
User-friendly Dashboard
Infatica highlights user-friendly dashboard as a core part of its enterprise-grade proxies proxy offering.
Customizable Geolocations
Infatica highlights customizable geolocations as a core part of its enterprise-grade proxies proxy offering.
What Users Say
Bright Data - Positive Feedback
"We've been using its proxies and so far we've faced no issues."
Robust data structuring, smooth geo-location switching, high availability
"LinkedIn dataset very well structured" (Indian School of Business)
Infatica - Positive Feedback
Infatica is rated 4.8/5 across 500+ user reviews
Coverage spans 195 countries with 20M+ IPs
Entry pricing starts at $0.15/GB
Bright Data - User Concerns
Strict KYC and complex onboarding ("requires users to justify their use cases")
Occasional Cloudflare bypass issues despite Web Unlocker
Interface complexity can overwhelm beginners
Infatica - User Concerns
Fewer in-depth community reviews compared to top-tier incumbents
Always validate performance against your specific target websites before scaling
Feature depth and compliance documentation vary by plan tier
1Bright Data Overall Sentiment
Respected as industry-leading but can be overkill for smaller projects. Recommended for enterprise-level scraping, with a learning curve to consider.
13Infatica Overall Sentiment
Infatica is a enterprise-grade proxies provider rated 4.8/5 by 500+ users. Enterprise-grade proxy solutions with 20M+ proxy IPs across 195 countries. Offering residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies with personalized service.
1Choose Bright Data
Bright Data (formerly Luminati) is the industry leader in residential proxy services, trusted by 20,000+ customers worldwide. With 150M+ ethically-sourced IPs from 195 countries and a 99.99% uptime SLA, Bright Data sets the gold standard for enterprise-grade proxy solutions.
13Choose Infatica
Enterprise-grade proxy solutions with 20M+ proxy IPs across 195 countries. Offering residential, mobile, ISP, and datacenter proxies with personalized service.
Bright Data vs Infatica: Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper: Bright Data or Infatica?
Infatica has the lower entry price at $0.15/GB, compared to Bright Data at $4.20/GB. Note that the cheapest tier is not always the best value — compare per-GB costs at your expected monthly volume.
Which has the larger IP pool: Bright Data or Infatica?
Bright Data advertises the larger pool (150M+ IPs), versus Infatica with 20M+ IPs. A larger pool generally means better IP rotation and lower block rates on protected targets.
Is Bright Data or Infatica better for web scraping?
Both providers support web scraping. Bright Data (Residential) reports ~0.7s response with coverage in 195+ countries, while Infatica (Enterprise-Grade Proxies) reports 0.4s response across 195 countries. For heavily protected targets, prioritize residential pool size and success rate; for high-volume scraping of simpler sites, datacenter speed and bandwidth pricing matter more.
Which provider has better user ratings: Bright Data or Infatica?
Bright Data holds the higher rating at 4.9/5 from 2850+ reviews, versus Infatica at 4.8/5 from 500+ reviews.
Should I choose Bright Data or Infatica?
Choose Bright Data if you need 150m+ ethically-sourced ips — it leads with its "Editor's Choice" positioning. Choose Infatica if 20m+ proxy ips matters more to your workflow. Both offer entry plans ($4.20/GB vs $0.15/GB), so testing each against your real targets is the most reliable way to decide.
Data points are based on provider-published specifications and our independent review process. Read how we test and review proxy providers.
Related Proxy Comparisons
Pricing, performance & features compared
IPRoyal vs Bright DataPricing, performance & features compared
Proxy-Seller vs Bright DataPricing, performance & features compared
Crawlbase vs Bright DataPricing, performance & features compared
ScraperAPI vs Bright DataPricing, performance & features compared
Bright Data vs SmartproxyPricing, performance & features compared
Bright Data vs WebsharePricing, performance & features compared
Bright Data vs NetNutPricing, performance & features compared
Bright Data vs SOAXPricing, performance & features compared